2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27499 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21983 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22867 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23195 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23801 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23991 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23834 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24424 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24093 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24262 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25013 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24477 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25179 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24605 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25143 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24927 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25153 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24759 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24666 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24925 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24513 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24859 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24004 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23592 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22941 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22538 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply