posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.
I take it you don't agree with what it says
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12496 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11021 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11411 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11021 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11706 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11912 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12027 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12011 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12213 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12259 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12533 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12602 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12666 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12693 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12582 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12717 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12516 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12453 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12404 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12717 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12582 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12693 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12666 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12602 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12533 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12259 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12213 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12011 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12286 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12062 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11589 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11367 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10830 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11367 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11589 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12062 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12027 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.