2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28238 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22545 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23453 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23822 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24408 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24603 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24463 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25036 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24725 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24919 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25684 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25143 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25837 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25273 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25791 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25613 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25775 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25387 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25356 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25541 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25138 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25482 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24609 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24199 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23562 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23127 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply