posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.
I take it you don't agree with what it says
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12998 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11044 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11412 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11834 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11412 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12126 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12347 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12464 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12434 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12639 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12694 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12845 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12994 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13080 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13129 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13112 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13176 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13026 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13177 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12980 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12903 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12856 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13177 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13026 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13176 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13112 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13129 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13080 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12994 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12845 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12694 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12639 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12434 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12741 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12497 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12013 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11778 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11216 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11778 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12013 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12497 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12464 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11044 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.