2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24983 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20051 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20857 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21187 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21679 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21906 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21783 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22356 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22069 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22180 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22920 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22493 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23154 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22578 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23110 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22844 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23101 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22735 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22520 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22931 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22582 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22769 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21981 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21564 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20909 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20526 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply