posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.
I take it you don't agree with what it says
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12893 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10955 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11327 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11727 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11327 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12021 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12248 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12361 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12348 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12547 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12596 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12744 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12878 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12965 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13015 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13024 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13064 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12932 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13068 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12863 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12795 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12748 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13068 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12932 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13064 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13024 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13015 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12965 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12878 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12744 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12596 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12547 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12348 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12633 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12398 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11914 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11680 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11138 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11680 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11914 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12398 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12361 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10955 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.