2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25155 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20157 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20970 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21296 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21800 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22026 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21893 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22456 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22184 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22312 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22596 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23258 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22673 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22951 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23205 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22849 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22644 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23039 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22701 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22879 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22105 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21676 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21021 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20641 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply