home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8847

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25773 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20539 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21375 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21697 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22194 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22397 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22297 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22875 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22566 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22727 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23461 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23000 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23670 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23088 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23630 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23364 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23623 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23249 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23070 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23435 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23078 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23307 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22500 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22103 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21426 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21064 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.