home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8838

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24995 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20070 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20887 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21214 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21707 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21927 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21809 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22374 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22091 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22207 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22933 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22510 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23175 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22593 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23122 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22859 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23114 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22754 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22542 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22948 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22593 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22781 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21991 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21577 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20923 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20541 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.