posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21940 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17687 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18464 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18759 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18464 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19282 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19511 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19702 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19749 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20141 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20113 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20401 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20197 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20315 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20453 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20339 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20340 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20089 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20125 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20174 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20340 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20339 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20453 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20315 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20197 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20401 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20113 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20141 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19749 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19702 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19585 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19958 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19571 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18778 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18495 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17811 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18495 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18778 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19571 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19386 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17687 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.