posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12799 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10864 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11233 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11632 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11233 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11916 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12139 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12258 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12244 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12442 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12483 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12642 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12776 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12869 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12911 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12915 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12953 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12823 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12959 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12761 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12691 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12629 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12959 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12823 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12953 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12915 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12911 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12869 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12776 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12642 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12483 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12244 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12531 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12278 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11816 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11566 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11023 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11566 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11816 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12278 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12258 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10864 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.