home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8810

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23252 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18711 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19533 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19838 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20384 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20595 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20470 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20861 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20808 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20892 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21422 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21209 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21662 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21287 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21614 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21556 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21610 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21445 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21175 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21396 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21258 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21232 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20660 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20045 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19585 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19043 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.