posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12862 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10933 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11303 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11703 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11303 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11997 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12222 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12339 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12326 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12525 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12570 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12722 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12853 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12941 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12991 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13000 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13042 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12912 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13047 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12841 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12772 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12725 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13047 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12912 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13042 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13000 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12991 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12941 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12853 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12722 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12570 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12525 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12326 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12612 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12369 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11892 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11658 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11116 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11658 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11892 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12339 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10933 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.