home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8961

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31558 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25277 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26187 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26617 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27177 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27430 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27363 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28027 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27668 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27855 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28702 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28016 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28731 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28192 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28689 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28588 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28683 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28262 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28400 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28433 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27904 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28378 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27492 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27038 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26338 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25924 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.