posted on 19/11/2020 12:00So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci.
i.e. "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12975 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10981 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11345 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11755 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11345 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12066 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12297 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12391 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12379 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12574 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12627 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12775 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12919 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13005 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13048 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13050 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13099 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12968 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13097 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12903 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12831 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12789 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13097 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12968 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13099 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13050 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13048 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13005 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12919 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12775 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12627 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12574 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12379 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12673 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12441 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11948 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11730 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11163 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11730 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11948 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12441 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12391 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10981 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.