posted on 19/11/2020 12:00So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci.
i.e. "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12970 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10975 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11342 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11745 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11342 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12057 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12285 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12387 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12372 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12568 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12622 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12766 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12905 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12995 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13043 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13044 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13089 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12958 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13094 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12898 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12820 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12778 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13094 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12958 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13089 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13044 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13043 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12995 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12905 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12766 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12622 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12568 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12372 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12663 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12428 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11939 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11718 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11156 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11718 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11939 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12428 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12387 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10975 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.