posted on 19/11/2020 12:00So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci.
i.e. "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13223 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11197 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11564 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11979 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11564 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12270 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12503 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12634 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12629 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12830 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12875 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13046 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13179 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13261 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13315 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13323 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13377 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13240 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13379 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13181 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13109 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 13038 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13379 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13240 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13377 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13323 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13315 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13261 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13179 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13046 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12875 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12830 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12629 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12932 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12676 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12196 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11938 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11390 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11938 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12196 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12676 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12634 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11197 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.