home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8961

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 12:00So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci.

i.e. "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31558 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25276 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26186 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26614 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27176 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27429 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27362 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28026 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27666 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27850 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28697 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28011 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28726 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28188 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28686 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28586 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28682 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28257 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28398 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28430 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27903 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28376 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27487 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27037 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26337 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25921 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.