posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23193 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18636 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19450 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19764 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19450 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20306 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20508 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20399 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20786 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20739 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20818 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21350 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21140 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21594 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21238 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21553 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21491 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21539 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21373 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21106 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21309 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21185 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21373 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21539 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21491 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21553 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21238 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21594 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21140 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21350 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20818 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20739 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20786 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21166 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20571 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19973 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19494 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18959 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19494 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19973 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20571 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20399 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18636 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.