posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26309 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21020 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21877 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22194 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21877 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22749 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22970 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22812 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23400 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23067 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23224 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23965 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23478 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24147 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23591 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24127 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23876 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24106 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23725 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23598 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23909 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23539 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23725 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24106 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23876 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24127 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23591 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24147 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23478 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23965 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23224 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23067 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23400 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23838 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22986 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22594 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21947 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21581 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21947 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22594 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22986 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22812 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21020 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


