posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23877 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19261 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20080 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20373 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20080 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20899 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21127 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21004 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21388 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21301 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21391 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21960 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21713 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22216 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21803 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22169 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22063 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22142 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21960 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21691 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21940 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21784 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21960 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22142 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22063 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22169 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21803 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22216 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21713 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21960 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21391 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21301 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21388 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21786 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21199 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20608 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20106 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19566 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20106 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20608 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21199 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21004 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19261 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


