posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21875 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17641 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18422 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18716 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18422 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19224 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19441 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19345 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19532 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19644 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19688 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20074 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20048 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20334 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20128 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20252 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20385 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20278 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20267 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20037 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20057 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20091 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20267 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20278 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20385 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20252 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20128 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20334 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20048 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20074 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19688 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19644 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19532 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19899 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19506 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18729 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18435 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17747 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18435 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18729 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19506 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19345 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17641 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.