posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26459 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22013 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22357 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22013 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22927 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23147 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22957 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23221 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23395 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24148 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23674 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24351 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23771 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24315 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24050 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24309 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23896 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23788 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24100 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23724 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23896 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24309 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24050 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24315 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23771 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24351 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23674 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24148 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23395 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23221 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23582 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24016 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23166 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22775 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22116 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21731 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22116 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22775 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23166 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22957 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


