posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21968 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17694 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18477 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18770 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18477 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19300 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19526 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19397 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19598 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19718 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19766 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20158 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20127 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20410 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20207 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20321 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20459 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20348 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20348 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20101 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20137 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20185 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20348 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20348 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20459 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20321 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20207 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20410 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20127 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20158 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19766 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19718 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19598 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19970 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19587 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18792 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18514 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17825 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18514 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18792 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19587 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19397 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17694 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.