posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21702 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17533 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18304 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18613 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18304 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19109 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19334 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19214 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19418 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19534 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19577 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19945 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19936 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20211 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20010 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20122 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20256 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20153 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20143 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19935 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19937 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19999 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20143 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20153 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20256 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20122 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20010 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20211 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19936 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19945 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19577 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19534 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19418 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19786 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19406 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18628 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18344 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17648 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18344 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18628 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19406 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19214 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17533 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.