posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26376 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21072 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21935 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22258 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21935 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22835 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23058 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22868 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23482 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23128 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23292 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24048 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23557 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24231 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23659 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24208 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23952 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24188 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23799 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23665 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23983 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23617 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23799 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24188 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23952 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24208 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23659 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24231 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23557 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24048 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23292 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23128 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23482 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23912 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23068 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22673 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22018 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21649 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22018 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22673 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23068 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22868 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21072 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


