posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24991 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20056 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20865 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21197 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20865 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21688 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21916 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21796 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22364 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22077 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22188 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22924 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22495 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23161 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22580 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23112 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22846 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23101 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22739 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22524 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22937 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22584 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22739 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23101 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22846 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23112 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22580 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23161 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22495 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22924 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22188 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22077 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22364 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22770 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21982 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21569 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20914 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20530 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20914 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21569 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21982 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21796 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20056 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


