posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21521 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17322 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18163 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18465 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18163 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18964 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19188 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19064 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19264 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19375 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19422 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19794 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19762 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20029 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19824 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19960 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20078 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19989 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19997 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19780 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19714 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19841 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19997 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19989 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20078 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19960 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19824 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20029 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19762 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19794 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19422 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19375 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19264 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19626 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19206 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18461 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18195 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17497 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18195 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18461 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19206 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19064 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17322 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.