posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23202 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18642 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19456 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19771 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19456 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20315 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20520 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20407 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20745 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20823 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21355 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21145 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21602 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21242 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21558 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21501 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21548 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21386 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21115 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21316 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21192 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21386 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21548 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21501 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21558 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21242 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21602 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21145 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21355 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20823 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20745 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20795 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21173 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20581 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19977 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19501 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18965 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19501 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19977 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20581 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20407 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18642 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.