Posts: 8897
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28229 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22534 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23444 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23817 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23444 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24401 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24600 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24458 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25028 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24719 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24913 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25678 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25140 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25835 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25269 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25788 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25608 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25769 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25381 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25352 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25537 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25134 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25381 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25769 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25608 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25788 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25269 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25835 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25140 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25678 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24913 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24719 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25028 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25476 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24602 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24189 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23555 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23120 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23555 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24189 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24602 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24458 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22534 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.