Posts: 8830
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24159 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19486 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20310 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20630 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20310 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21143 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21355 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21231 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21659 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21526 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21635 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22273 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21967 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22494 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22041 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22454 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22298 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22428 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22199 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21956 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22250 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22027 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22199 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22428 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22298 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22454 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22041 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22494 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21967 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22273 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21635 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21526 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21659 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22078 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21436 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20894 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20351 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19855 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20351 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20894 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21436 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21231 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19486 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.