Posts: 8847
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25776 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20539 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21377 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21700 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21377 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22199 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22402 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22305 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22879 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22568 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22729 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23462 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23002 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23671 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23089 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23632 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23364 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23626 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23250 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23070 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23437 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23078 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23250 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23626 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23364 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23632 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23089 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23671 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23002 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23462 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22729 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22568 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22879 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23308 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22500 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22105 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21426 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21065 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21426 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22105 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22500 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22305 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20539 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.