Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21872 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17640 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18415 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18715 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18415 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19224 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19438 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19342 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19531 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19642 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19685 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20074 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20046 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20330 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20127 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20248 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20384 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20278 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20265 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20036 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20053 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20088 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20265 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20278 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20384 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20248 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20127 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20330 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20046 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20074 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19685 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19642 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19531 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19899 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19504 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18728 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18434 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17745 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18434 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18728 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19504 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19342 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17640 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.