Posts: 8868
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26331 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21038 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21894 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22215 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21894 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22777 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22995 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22835 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23431 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23089 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23245 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24001 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23508 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24176 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23614 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24159 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23901 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24134 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23757 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23620 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23935 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23566 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23757 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24134 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23901 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24159 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23614 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24176 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23508 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24001 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23245 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23089 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23431 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23867 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23015 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22618 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21967 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21607 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21967 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22618 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23015 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22835 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21038 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.