Posts: 8882
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27550 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22032 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22922 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23247 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22922 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23854 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24043 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23885 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24476 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24142 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24312 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25063 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24525 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25230 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24654 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25193 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24982 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25203 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24808 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24719 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24974 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24563 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24808 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25203 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24982 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25193 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24654 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25230 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24525 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25063 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24312 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24142 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24476 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24910 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24054 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23643 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22991 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22589 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22991 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23643 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24054 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23885 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22032 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.