Posts: 8930
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30637 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24436 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25339 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25768 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25339 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26319 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26553 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26434 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27060 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26711 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26886 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27692 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27104 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27794 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27248 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27715 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27605 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27706 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27314 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27411 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27475 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27013 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27314 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27706 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27605 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27715 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27248 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27794 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27104 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27692 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26886 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26711 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27060 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27435 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26555 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26107 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25456 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25033 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25456 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26107 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26555 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26434 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24436 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.