Posts: 8902
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28391 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22620 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23530 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23893 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23530 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24480 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24671 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24529 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25126 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24791 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24997 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25789 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25208 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25939 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25350 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25886 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25700 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25872 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25459 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25425 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25635 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25198 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25459 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25872 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25700 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25886 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25350 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25939 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25208 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25789 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24997 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24791 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25126 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25559 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24676 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24276 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23621 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23208 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23621 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24276 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24676 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24529 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22620 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.