posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12841 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10917 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11283 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11682 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11283 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11973 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12198 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12317 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12303 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12504 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12543 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12699 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12838 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12919 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12967 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12973 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13013 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12886 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13024 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12816 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12746 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12700 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13024 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12886 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13013 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12973 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12967 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12919 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12838 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12699 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12543 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12504 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12303 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12589 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12334 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11870 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11627 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11089 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11627 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11870 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12334 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12317 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10917 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.