Posts: 8838
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24925 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20005 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20811 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21146 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20811 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21642 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21869 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21742 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22314 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22026 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22135 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22872 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22449 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23112 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22536 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23067 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22798 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23053 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22686 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22472 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22893 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22535 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22686 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23053 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22798 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23067 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22536 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23112 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22449 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22872 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22135 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22026 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22314 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22728 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21941 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21525 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20869 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20476 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20869 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21525 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21941 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21742 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20005 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.