Posts: 8868
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26406 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21101 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21963 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22297 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21963 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22876 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23098 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22903 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23520 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23167 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23329 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24094 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23599 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24271 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23695 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24250 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23990 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24226 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23828 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23700 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24025 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23657 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23828 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24226 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23990 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24250 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23695 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24271 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23599 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24094 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23329 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23520 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23951 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23104 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22717 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22061 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21680 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22061 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22717 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23104 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22903 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21101 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.