Posts: 8810
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23270 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18735 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19553 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19862 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19553 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20422 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20628 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20496 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20885 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20832 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20916 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21437 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21235 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21680 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21315 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21637 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21591 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21634 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21461 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21202 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21419 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21287 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21461 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21634 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21591 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21637 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21315 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21680 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21235 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21437 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20916 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20832 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20885 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21255 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20686 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20067 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19609 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19064 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19609 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20067 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20686 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20496 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18735 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.