Posts: 8852
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26034 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20731 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21579 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21889 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21579 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22446 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22677 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22511 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23074 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22768 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22920 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23635 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23182 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23837 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23285 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23816 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23557 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23782 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23423 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23256 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23583 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23231 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23423 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23782 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23557 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23816 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23285 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23837 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23182 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23635 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22920 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22768 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23074 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23512 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22689 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22277 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21629 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21248 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21629 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22277 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22689 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22511 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20731 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.