Posts: 8826
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23828 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19242 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20053 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20358 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20053 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20880 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21101 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20984 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21364 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21287 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21375 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21937 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21700 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22183 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21789 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22148 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22052 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22110 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21949 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21681 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21911 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21753 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21949 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22110 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22052 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22148 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21789 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22183 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21700 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21937 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21375 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21287 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21364 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21754 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21168 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20581 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20077 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19526 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20077 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20581 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21168 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20984 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19242 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.