Posts: 8852
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26005 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20688 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21534 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21844 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21534 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22405 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22639 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22464 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23033 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22727 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22883 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23610 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23144 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23803 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23242 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23785 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23521 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23748 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23377 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23207 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23549 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23200 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23377 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23748 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23521 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23785 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23242 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23803 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23144 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23610 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22883 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22727 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23033 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23479 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22663 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22255 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21592 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21215 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21592 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22255 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22663 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22464 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20688 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.