Posts: 8868
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26359 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21057 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21920 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22240 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21920 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22798 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22851 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23454 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23108 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23269 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24026 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23531 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24201 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23639 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24183 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23923 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24158 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23781 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23639 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23955 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23593 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23781 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24158 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23923 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24183 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23639 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24201 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23531 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24026 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23269 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23108 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23454 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23884 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23044 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22650 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21997 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21627 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21997 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22650 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23044 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22851 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21057 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.