Posts: 8826
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24070 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19414 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20227 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20551 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20227 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21069 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21290 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21164 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21580 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21466 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21561 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22162 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21890 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22404 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21971 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22367 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22224 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22334 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22115 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21872 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22151 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21960 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22115 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22334 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22224 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22367 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21971 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22404 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21890 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22162 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21561 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21466 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21580 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21982 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21366 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20804 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20284 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19758 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20284 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20804 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21366 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21164 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19414 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.