Posts: 8810
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23235 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18693 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19519 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19823 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19519 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20364 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20572 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20456 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20844 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20796 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20874 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21402 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21200 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21649 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21278 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21605 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21547 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21601 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21434 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21157 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21376 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21244 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21434 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21601 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21547 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21605 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21278 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21649 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21200 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21402 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20874 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20796 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20844 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21220 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20641 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20027 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19566 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19025 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19566 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20027 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20641 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20456 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18693 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.