Posts: 8923
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29725 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23599 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24518 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24892 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24518 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25478 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25687 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25594 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26180 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25844 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26023 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26838 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26270 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26957 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26407 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26890 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26759 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26887 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26495 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26554 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26631 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26194 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26495 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26887 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26759 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26890 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26407 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26957 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26270 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26838 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26023 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25844 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26180 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26588 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25707 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25279 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24637 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24202 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24637 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25279 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25707 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25594 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23599 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.