posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13175 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11176 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11536 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11951 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11536 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12240 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12468 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12601 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12591 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12789 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12836 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13006 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13143 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13227 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13272 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13285 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13331 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13185 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13331 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13136 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13071 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12999 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13331 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13185 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13331 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13285 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13272 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13227 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13143 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13006 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12836 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12789 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12591 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12895 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12631 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12161 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11901 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11364 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11901 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12161 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12631 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12601 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11176 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.