Posts: 8868
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26249 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20958 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21817 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22140 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21817 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22691 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22911 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22747 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23343 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23007 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23167 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23909 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23419 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24087 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23529 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24065 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23817 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24044 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23667 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23543 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23851 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23481 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23667 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24044 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23817 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24065 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23529 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24087 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23419 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23909 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23007 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23343 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23776 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22926 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22533 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21889 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21522 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21889 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22533 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22926 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22747 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20958 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.