Posts: 8930
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30544 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24343 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25256 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25673 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25256 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26230 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26450 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26331 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26961 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26608 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26771 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27597 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27001 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27690 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27134 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27608 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27508 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27604 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27207 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27290 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27371 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26902 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27207 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27604 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27508 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27608 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27134 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27690 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27001 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27597 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26771 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26961 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27336 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26451 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26008 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25355 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24943 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25355 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26008 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26451 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26331 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24343 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.