Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21743 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17561 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18329 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18637 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18329 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19134 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19361 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19237 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19444 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19559 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19605 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19975 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19965 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20040 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20151 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20286 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20193 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20180 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19959 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19968 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20022 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20180 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20193 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20286 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20151 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20040 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19965 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19975 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19605 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19559 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19444 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19807 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19426 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18656 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18361 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17671 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18361 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18656 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19426 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19237 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17561 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.