Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21631 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17478 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18254 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18570 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18254 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19082 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19296 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19162 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19363 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19487 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19520 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19891 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19871 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20141 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19931 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20055 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20191 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20086 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20085 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19884 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19877 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19949 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20085 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20086 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20191 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20055 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19931 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20141 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19871 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19891 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19520 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19487 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19363 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19734 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19359 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18570 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18300 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17600 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18300 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18570 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19162 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17478 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.