Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21884 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17643 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18422 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18719 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18422 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19228 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19448 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19346 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19536 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19649 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19691 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20079 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20054 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20338 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20131 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20254 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20387 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20284 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20274 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20041 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20062 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20094 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20274 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20284 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20387 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20254 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20131 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20338 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20054 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20079 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19691 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19649 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19536 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19902 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19512 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18732 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18439 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17749 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18439 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18732 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19512 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19346 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17643 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.