Posts: 8897
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28089 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22426 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23344 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23703 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23344 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24299 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24501 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24343 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24940 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24612 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24809 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25596 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25021 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25728 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25152 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25696 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25481 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25666 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25264 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25219 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25446 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25022 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25264 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25666 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25481 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25696 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25152 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25728 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25021 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25596 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24809 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24612 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24940 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25381 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24509 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24098 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23456 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23025 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23456 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24098 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24509 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24343 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22426 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.