Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21661 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17509 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18280 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18600 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18280 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19098 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19320 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19192 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19509 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19548 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19910 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19899 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20177 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19972 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20092 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20232 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20120 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20119 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19912 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19908 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19973 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20119 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20120 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20232 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20092 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19972 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20177 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19899 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19910 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19548 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19509 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19392 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19758 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19383 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18608 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18325 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17622 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18325 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18608 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19383 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19192 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17509 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.