posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22945 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18417 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19225 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19550 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19225 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20104 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20303 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20172 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20522 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20493 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20574 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21085 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20910 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21342 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21003 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21285 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21270 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21279 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21153 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20897 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21074 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20984 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21153 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21279 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21270 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21285 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21003 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21342 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20910 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21085 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20574 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20493 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20522 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20909 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20366 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19722 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19293 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18695 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19293 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19722 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20366 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20172 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18417 times)