2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae

It does seems strange (to an outsider) that, as their power is slipping away, the hard left are now calling for party unity, but didn't seem so keen on it when they were in control.

Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech doesn't smack much of unity either. Nor do comments like it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" or "You and I know full well it was ******", that appear to be completely dismissing the report's findings.

It does look (again to an outsider) that there is a (large?) section of Corbynistas that think there was, and is, no problems to address.

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20825 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16798 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17561 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17914 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18389 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18564 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18482 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18708 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18789 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18818 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19228 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19198 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19443 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19246 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19366 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19507 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19374 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19406 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19215 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19154 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19198 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19043 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18663 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17894 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17641 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16961 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae

Report Abuse