posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20808 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16788 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17548 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17902 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17548 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18374 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18554 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18469 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18695 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18778 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18804 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19212 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19188 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19433 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19235 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19345 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19490 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19364 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19383 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19202 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19140 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19192 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19383 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19364 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19490 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19345 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19235 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19433 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19188 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19212 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18804 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18778 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18695 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19028 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18656 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17883 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17635 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16949 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17635 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17883 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18656 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18469 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16788 times)