posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13126 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11125 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11490 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11900 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11490 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12178 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12405 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12540 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12536 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12727 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12774 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12948 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13075 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13168 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13210 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13222 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13258 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13124 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13255 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13063 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13002 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12929 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13255 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13124 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13258 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13222 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13210 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13168 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13075 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12948 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12774 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12727 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12536 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12834 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12574 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12106 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11843 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11293 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11843 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12106 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12574 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12540 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11125 times)