posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13014 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11063 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11430 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11849 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11430 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12137 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12488 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12465 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12665 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12713 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12870 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13011 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13098 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13141 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13138 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13195 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13051 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13195 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12999 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12926 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12875 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13195 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13051 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13195 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13138 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13141 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13098 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13011 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12870 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12713 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12665 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12465 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12757 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12518 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12030 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11790 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11234 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11790 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12030 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12518 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12488 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11063 times)