posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22982 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18446 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19253 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19576 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19253 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20132 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20331 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20201 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20557 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20528 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20604 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21123 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20942 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21383 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21032 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21319 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21298 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21324 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21183 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20933 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21120 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21011 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21183 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21324 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21298 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21319 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21032 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21383 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20942 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21123 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20604 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20528 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20557 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20960 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20391 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19761 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19323 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18741 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19323 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19761 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20391 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20201 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18446 times)