Posts: 178124
posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31508 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25217 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26140 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26566 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26140 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27113 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27370 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27306 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27962 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27606 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27784 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28631 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27946 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28679 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28138 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28629 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28524 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28629 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28209 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28344 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28373 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27857 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28209 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28629 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28524 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28629 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28138 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28679 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27946 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28631 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27784 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27606 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27962 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28323 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27427 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26972 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26278 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25858 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26278 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26972 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27427 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27306 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25217 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.