Posts: 174961
posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24695 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19865 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20664 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20973 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20664 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21485 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21700 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21583 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22122 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21872 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21984 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22700 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22296 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22931 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22364 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22892 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22626 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22878 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22532 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22285 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22690 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22361 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22532 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22878 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22626 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22892 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22364 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22931 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22296 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22700 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21984 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21872 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22122 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22526 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21764 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21333 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20705 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20318 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20705 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21333 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21764 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21583 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19865 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.