posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22864 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18335 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19148 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19459 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19148 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20013 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20216 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20080 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20416 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20406 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20491 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20989 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20812 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21229 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20894 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21165 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21167 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21172 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21057 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20797 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20965 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20889 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21057 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21172 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21167 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21165 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20894 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21229 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20812 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20989 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20491 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20406 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20416 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20798 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20277 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19614 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19205 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18594 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19205 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19614 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20277 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20080 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18335 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.